A New Phase for China’s Ping-Pong Diplomacy in Syria
Young Syrian table tennis star Hend Zaza is China-bound, just as China’s ambitions in the Levant intensify.
It comes as no surprise that Zaza would have her heart set on China. It is the world’s hub for top table tennis players. Over the last 60 years, the Chinese table tennis team has won over 230 gold medals and developed a three-tiered government-funded training system of local organizations, province-wide table tennis schools, and a national team boasting the world’s best coaches. Table tennis is an important national sport domestically in China and source of prominent Chinese contemporary culture icons like Ning. With China as her training ground, Zaza becomes a part of the world’s most elite table tennis circles.
At this pivotal moment in turbulent U.S.-China relations, Zaza’s pending journey reminds readers of other geopolitical relationships built on table tennis. In April 1971, a friendly exchange between American player Glen Cowan and Chinese player Zhuang Zedong paved the way for a National Committee on U.S.-China Relations-led invitation of American diplomats to Beijing. The friendship-turned-political-action culminated in the arrival of Richard Nixon to Beijing in 1972. Time Magazine hailed this seismic political moment as the “ping heard round the world.”
It seems too soon to say whether China similarly intends welcoming Zaza as a symbol for diplomatic outreach to the wider Middle East. But the 11-year-old’s China dream epitomizes a geopolitical power shift east; one where the United States’ historically dominant role is receding in China’s favor. Western China-Middle East analysts often homogenize China’s political and economic role in the Middle East’s diverse nations as exclusively focused on fossil fuel investments or on exporting clean energy tech. In those contexts, the term “Middle East” is often only used to reference a handful of Middle Eastern countries receiving large-scale energy investments from China, including the Gulf countries, Iran, and most recently, Egypt.
However, Zaza’s journey sheds light on the less clear long-term intentions of China’s role in the Levant, a region comprised of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, Palestine. While Chinese and Syrian diplomatic relations date back to 1956, China recently stepped to the fore in the Levant with Xi’s 2018 pledge of $15 million to Palestine, along with another $91 million to Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen. Although these amounts seem significant, they are miniscule compared to China’s billions of investments in Gulf countries. This makes Xi’s 2018 pledge look more like a development promise than a bold strategic investment.
Syria differs greatly from other Levantine nations in that a nearly decade-long civil and proxy war continues to ravage the nation, leaving 5.5 million Syrians refugees internationally and over 6.1 million internally displaced. While Syria is the most oil rich country in the Levant, its estimated 2.5 billion barrels of oil reserves are dwarfed in comparison to – for example – Saudi Arabia’s 257 billion. Despite the comparative lack of oil regionally and intense conflict still raging in the country, China remains a leading candidate in bids to rebuild Syrian infrastructure. The likely immediate incentive for China to continue its relations with the Assad regime in Syria is to develop an “industrial port” linking the Red Sea, the Arabian Sea and the Persian Gulf to China’s other growing Belt and Road (BRI) projects across the region.
So far in the Levant, it would appear that China is defining its role as both development diplomat willing to work with any regime to meet BRI targets, all the while providing small-scale investments to stabilize relations in countries across the region. China’s role thus fills the vacuum that U.S. pullback from a more active foreign policy in the region is leaving behind. During COVID-19, China has also stepped up its aid diplomacy in Syria. In April 2020, China delivered a first batch of medical aid to Syria, including 2,016 COVID-19 test kits, and several rounds of medical gear. Diplomats in both countries also spoke in August about further details of subsequent aid shipments.
Whatever the mix of soft-power foreign aid approaches China is taking to assert a presence in the Levant, they appear to be tilting public perceptions in China’s favor. A July 2020 report from German organization Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V (KAS) indicates domestic perceptions Levant-side regarding China’s pandemic role have been overwhelmingly positive. More broadly, many citizens across MENA are optimistic about the prospect of closer post-COVID-relations than originally anticipated between their country and China. This reaction to China’s COVID-19 soft power fits right in to what analyst Jesse Marks coined as “competition without confrontation,” wherein Chinese foreign policy strategy in the Middle East has the potential to shift international power balances that have historically tipped more strongly to the U.S. side.
Given escalations in recent years in the China-Middle East relationship, post-COVID-diplomacy will shape China’s future in the eyes of locals in the Middle East and the developing world at large. Therefore, interpreting Hend Zaza’s invitation to China as an exclusively diplomatic act is reductive of China’s multi-pronged approach to diplomacy in the Middle East integrating social, economic, and energy concerns. If China is to solidify its leadership position as a global leader post COVID-19, it needs to ensure stable relations in the Middle East while maintaining a strong soft-power presence – perhaps via ping-pong diplomacy or an equivalent – in the Levant.
The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views and editorial stance of the SOHR.
Source: A New Phase for China’s Ping-Pong Diplomacy in Syria – The Diplomat