‘Pipeline or lifeline?’ Syria’s Assad and Russia seek future gains from US gas deal

As Russian President Vladimir Putin met his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Sochi to address escalating tensions in Idlib, Moscow and Damascus are working to consolidate recent political gains made along the country’s southern border.

On Tuesday, a team of Lebanese technicians, along with their Syrian counterparts, completed an inspection of the Arab Gas Pipeline in the war-torn country through which Egyptian natural gas is set to transit, as part of a US-backed plan to address Lebanon’s energy crisis.

Work on the pipeline has progressed swiftly and comes as Damascus finds itself at the centre of a subtle shift in the region. After nearly a decade of international isolation, it is emerging back into the fold of regional diplomacy in ways unseen since the start of the country’s devastating ten-year conflict.

Earlier this month, a senior Lebanese government delegation visited Damascus in a move that marked the end of years of frozen relations between the two neighbours.

And in Amman, capital of one of the US’s closest regional allies, Syrian defence and energy ministers have attended discussions on the gas deal with their Jordanian and Egyptian counterparts.
Syria is one of the transit countries the Biden administration plans to use to meet Lebanon’s energy needs, at a time when the country grapples with one of the world’s worst economic crises.

The US ambassador to Lebanon announced the deal over the summer in a move widely seen as a response to Hezbollah’s ongoing shipments of Iranian fuel to the impoverished country.

The participation of Damascus in the plan, however, has raised alarm by some, that in seeking to address Lebanon’s crisis, the Biden administration risks boosting Russia and Syria’s goal of re-establishing the Assad government in the Middle East, while obtaining limited concessions on security and political fronts in the process.

“The Russians want acknowledgement of what they see as their military victory in Syria, but know they can’t tout it as a success,” James Jeffrey, the former US special representative for Syria, told Middle East Eye.

“To do that they need the rehabilitation of Assad diplomatically, they need sanctions relief and they need a massive reconstruction programme,” he added.

Some say that with Syria now taking part in the US plan to aid Lebanon, Russia may sense an opening to push for its agenda.

“This deal is seen as a major achievement for the Kremlin,” Nikolay Kozhanov, a fellow with Chatham House, told MEE.

Moscow’s moment
Russia intervened in the Syrian conflict in 2015 and its air support helped turn the tide of the war, allowing Assad to claw back nearly 70 percent of the territory he had lost to rebels following the 2011 Arab spring uprising.

Since then, it has entrenched itself in the country and sought to use its position in Syria to extend its influence in the wider Middle East.

The last few weeks have seen an uptick in diplomacy between Russian and US officials. Brett McGurk, White House coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa, met with his Russian counterparts in Geneva to discuss the Lebanese gas deal and US sanctions imposed on Syria.

Walla News reported that Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was also asking Israel to push the US to agree to hold trilateral talks on the Syrian conflict.

“Russia is treating the White House’s gas deal as a signal that the new American administration is not going to be that tough on Syria or implement all the means of pressure it has against Assad,” Kozhanov added.

The Biden administration’s Syria policy is still officially under review and the State Department did not respond to MEE’s questions regarding Syria sanctions by the time of publication.
Many of the oil and gas resources the government controls have been carved up by Russian firms with close ties to the Kremlin.

Companies linked to the Wagner Group, a Russian mercenary firm, have obtained stakes in oil and gas deposits in former Islamic State-controlled territory of Syria. And Damascus has also granted Russian companies the rights for energy exploration off its Mediterranean coast.

In a sign of how much Russia has managed to extend its grip over the Syrian economy, a company with close links to Vladimir Putin is also tied to Syria’s end of the Arab Gas pipeline, according to Intelligence Online.

Owned by Gennady Timchenko, an oligarch sanctioned by the US government, Stroytransgaz built Syria’s portion of the Arab Gas pipeline and remains one of its main contractors.

Mammadov said the rehabilitation of the pipeline will likely benefit the company and feed the narrative that by venturing into Syria early, some Russian companies can position themselves for Syria’s post-war future.

“They are hoping when the war is over and there are opportunities, they will be the first in line,” he said. “If there is a political settlement, Syria can play an important role as a transit country in the wider region.”

The Russian companies operating in Syria’s oil and gas industry are mostly small firms, comfortable working in defiance of international sanctions.

Kozhanov says Syria’s dire economic situation and the continued presence of sanctions means Russia’s ability to exploit the country for economic gain remains limited. “The main benefit for Russia is political,” Kozhanov said.

Can Russia win this?
Yacoubian said the Biden administration’s focus on the pipeline was part of its pledge to put humanitarian aid at the centre of Washington’s foreign policy.

“It is about a return to diplomacy,” she said. “[And] one could see this as part of an overarching effort to deescalate tensions in the region.”

The issue of aid to Syria has been a top priority for the White House, and Biden raised the topic earlier this summer in his summit with Putin.

A Russian-US agreement in July paved the way for the UN Security Council to extend the delivery of humanitarian assistance through Syria’s Bab al-Hawa border for six months. Moscow cheered the news with its UN ambassador heralding it as “a turning point” for Syria and the region.

The concern within some foreign policy circles in Washington is that this approach, along with Biden administration’s wider desire to extricate itself from Middle Eastern conflicts, paves the way for geopolitical rivals to step into a power vacuum.

“Russia has a much more ambitious goal than acknowledgment of a military victory in Syria,” Jeffrey said. “They want to leverage their position in the country to rewrite the security structure of the entire Middle East.”
Russia may be eager to showcase its success in stabilising Syria and laying the groundwork for reconstruction, but it still faces a host of security challenges, including the continued threat of terrorism.

Earlier this month, the Islamic State (IS) group claimed responsibility for a bombing that disabled a portion of the pipeline meant to supply gas to Lebanon.

In addition to the presence of US and Turkish troops in the country, Israel has continued to strike Iranian proxies inside Syria at will.

“The Saudis, the Israelis and the Turks don’t want to let Russia and Assad win this thing,” Jeffrey said.

The assault this summer on the rebel-stronghold of Daraa was seen by some as an attempt by Iran-backed troops and their Syrian government allies to consolidate control over the area in southern Syria where the pipeline passes, posing a potential complication to any security guarantees the Assad government and Moscow will have to make for the project.

“The Russians are going to be much more concerned about Iranian attempts to use this territory for operations against Israel,” Kozhanov said.

But so far, there have been few signs of a wider fissure between Tehran and Moscow over the deal. Russia stood down when Iranian militias put Daraa under siege this summer, breaking a 2018 ceasefire negotiated by the Kremlin.

And on the international stage, Russia recently supported Iran in its accession to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.

By turning on the flow of gas, the US has created a new dimension for Moscow’s gambit in Syria. How it handles the opportunity will likely have more implications than just meeting the energy needs of Lebanon.

 

 

SOURCE: Middle East Eye

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the Observatory.