Syria opposition slams UN’s ‘step for step’ peace push
Syrian opposition forces on Wednesday criticised the United Nations for advocating a “step for step” approach to resolving the grinding conflict, saying it would further embolden an intransigent regime.
Following a tour of Europe, the US and Arab states, UN special envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen called in December for efforts to try to build trust between warring parties by setting precise and “verifiable” steps.
The call followed the failure of several rounds of UN-brokered negotiations in Geneva between the government and opposition groups aimed at forging a new constitution.
On Wednesday, the Syrian opposition forces’ High Negotiations Committee (HNC) said step for step diplomacy would give “incentives” to a regime that has already demonstrated its rejection of a UN-led peace process.
“It will push it towards more intransigence, and will impede implementation of international resolutions,” it said in a statement.
The response to Pedersen came after Syrian opposition forces met for talks in Qatar in a new bid to revive their decade-old campaign against President Bashar al-Assad.
Speaking to AFP at the conference, Salem al-Meslet, head of the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, said that a united opposition would send a “an important message to the UN envoy”.
The last round of UN-organised peace talks in October failed to make any progress, and Pedersen has highlighted “great mistrust on all sides”.
The war in Syria is estimated to have killed nearly half a million people and displaced millions more since it began with a brutal crackdown on anti-government protests in 2011.
With major fighting having subsided since 2020, Damascus has made inroads into easing its international isolation, especially with fellow Arab states.
Meanwhile, the opposition forces have seen their influence wane in recent years, with many of their foreign backers now moving towards normalising ties with Assad’s government.
Source: Al Arabiya
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the Observatory.